<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media 2.0 New News Releases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.miss604.com/2008/02/social-media-20-new-news-releases.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.miss604.com/2008/02/social-media-20-new-news-releases.html</link>
	<description>Vancouver Blog Miss604</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:36:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: littleblackduck</title>
		<link>http://www.miss604.com/2008/02/social-media-20-new-news-releases.html#comment-5393</link>
		<dc:creator>littleblackduck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miss604.com/2008/02/social-media-20-new-news-releases.html#comment-5393</guid>
		<description>They lost me on &quot;workflow solutions provider&quot;. WTF is that? (speaking as someone who knows full well what line of business they&#039;re in) Then, as you point out, there&#039;s references to either 2.0 or &#039;social media&#039; like so much blog spam, not to mention the scrambled layout. Which is odd, since in general their website&#039;s not bad.
The weirdest thing is that neither 2.0 or &#039;social media&#039; appear in their keyword cloud, but &#039;embedded&#039; and &#039;america&#039; do?  At least they&#039;re trying, but still...
I&#039;ve meant to blog along these lines myself (I&#039;ve been lazy lately), but news releases and social media and x number of hits and links means nothing if people can&#039;t be bothered to read the actual content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They lost me on &#8220;workflow solutions provider&#8221;. WTF is that? (speaking as someone who knows full well what line of business they&#8217;re in) Then, as you point out, there&#8217;s references to either 2.0 or &#8216;social media&#8217; like so much blog spam, not to mention the scrambled layout. Which is odd, since in general their website&#8217;s not bad.<br />
The weirdest thing is that neither 2.0 or &#8216;social media&#8217; appear in their keyword cloud, but &#8216;embedded&#8217; and &#8216;america&#8217; do?  At least they&#8217;re trying, but still&#8230;<br />
I&#8217;ve meant to blog along these lines myself (I&#8217;ve been lazy lately), but news releases and social media and x number of hits and links means nothing if people can&#8217;t be bothered to read the actual content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Heuer</title>
		<link>http://www.miss604.com/2008/02/social-media-20-new-news-releases.html#comment-5392</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Heuer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miss604.com/2008/02/social-media-20-new-news-releases.html#comment-5392</guid>
		<description>The original point of the Social Media Release was not as a point of communicating to the influencers insomuch as it was to become a trusted point of information distribution and enabling that information to be more easily socialized (shared and found).  The place where people could know they get the full facts and through which it connects with other places where people want to share that information, with their own take/analysis on the &#039;news&#039;.

So many folks are interpreting the &#039;words&#039; Social Media Release without checking into the intention - this has made this conversation very fractured and created further confusion, but this is the challenge of conversation over control, and I am glad we are having it despite the frustration.  Unfortunately, many other people are misappropriating the idea and leveraging the larger meme to their own advantage for helping them sell their products to the unaware professionals who are trying to figure out the broader issues involved in social media.  The idea has never been to simply replace the old school press release with a new format that would be used in the same way as before - it has always been about transforming the practice of public relations to better serve the interests of the client and the community they serve in light of technological and social advancements in communication.

Will be glad to talk about this next week at Northern Voice further... see you soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original point of the Social Media Release was not as a point of communicating to the influencers insomuch as it was to become a trusted point of information distribution and enabling that information to be more easily socialized (shared and found).  The place where people could know they get the full facts and through which it connects with other places where people want to share that information, with their own take/analysis on the &#8216;news&#8217;.</p>
<p>So many folks are interpreting the &#8216;words&#8217; Social Media Release without checking into the intention &#8211; this has made this conversation very fractured and created further confusion, but this is the challenge of conversation over control, and I am glad we are having it despite the frustration.  Unfortunately, many other people are misappropriating the idea and leveraging the larger meme to their own advantage for helping them sell their products to the unaware professionals who are trying to figure out the broader issues involved in social media.  The idea has never been to simply replace the old school press release with a new format that would be used in the same way as before &#8211; it has always been about transforming the practice of public relations to better serve the interests of the client and the community they serve in light of technological and social advancements in communication.</p>
<p>Will be glad to talk about this next week at Northern Voice further&#8230; see you soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.miss604.com/2008/02/social-media-20-new-news-releases.html#comment-5391</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miss604.com/2008/02/social-media-20-new-news-releases.html#comment-5391</guid>
		<description>+1 on all of that, and thanks for the pluggage.

I&#039;ve never really been keen on the whole notion of the social media press release, because it implies non-personalized broadcasting.

When I have a story to pitch, whether it&#039;s to bloggers or the mainstream media, I customize each email (or whatever) I send. There&#039;s always going to be content that&#039;s the same, or similar, but that&#039;s never the whole message.

If there are resources that people need, I get the client to  write a blog post and/or we create a &#039;social media resources page&#039; (though I don&#039;t actually call the page that awful name) which has all of the video, photos, product info et al that a journalist or blogger might want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 on all of that, and thanks for the pluggage.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never really been keen on the whole notion of the social media press release, because it implies non-personalized broadcasting.</p>
<p>When I have a story to pitch, whether it&#8217;s to bloggers or the mainstream media, I customize each email (or whatever) I send. There&#8217;s always going to be content that&#8217;s the same, or similar, but that&#8217;s never the whole message.</p>
<p>If there are resources that people need, I get the client to  write a blog post and/or we create a &#8216;social media resources page&#8217; (though I don&#8217;t actually call the page that awful name) which has all of the video, photos, product info et al that a journalist or blogger might want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.miss604.com/2008/02/social-media-20-new-news-releases.html#comment-5390</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miss604.com/2008/02/social-media-20-new-news-releases.html#comment-5390</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never understood the appeal of Second Life as a marketing tool beyond a simple in-game ad which certainly wouldn&#039;t make me want to seek it out within the game...and this is from someone that &#039;gets it&#039; (at least I think I do) and from someone that has played online games FAR too much (2 year tour of WoW duty among others).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never understood the appeal of Second Life as a marketing tool beyond a simple in-game ad which certainly wouldn&#8217;t make me want to seek it out within the game&#8230;and this is from someone that &#8216;gets it&#8217; (at least I think I do) and from someone that has played online games FAR too much (2 year tour of WoW duty among others).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tod Maffin</title>
		<link>http://www.miss604.com/2008/02/social-media-20-new-news-releases.html#comment-5389</link>
		<dc:creator>Tod Maffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miss604.com/2008/02/social-media-20-new-news-releases.html#comment-5389</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my take on what should be the next rev of a news release:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://todmaffin.com/newformat&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://todmaffin.com/newformat&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my take on what should be the next rev of a news release:</p>
<p><a href="http://todmaffin.com/newformat" rel="nofollow">http://todmaffin.com/newformat</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

