<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New iPod Shuffle Minimalism at a Whole New Level</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.miss604.com/2009/03/the-new-ipod-shuffle-minimalism-at-a-whole-new-level.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.miss604.com/2009/03/the-new-ipod-shuffle-minimalism-at-a-whole-new-level.html</link>
	<description>Vancouver Blog Miss604</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:17:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jny</title>
		<link>http://www.miss604.com/2009/03/the-new-ipod-shuffle-minimalism-at-a-whole-new-level.html#comment-11558</link>
		<dc:creator>jny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 04:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miss604.com/?p=9129#comment-11558</guid>
		<description>seriously if u saw how to use this new ipod ud say WTF. they made this thing so compicated to use.
And seriously 4gb shuffle is $100, thats the same price of a 4gb zune which offers so much more and HAS A SCREEN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seriously if u saw how to use this new ipod ud say WTF. they made this thing so compicated to use.<br />
And seriously 4gb shuffle is $100, thats the same price of a 4gb zune which offers so much more and HAS A SCREEN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.miss604.com/2009/03/the-new-ipod-shuffle-minimalism-at-a-whole-new-level.html#comment-11557</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miss604.com/?p=9129#comment-11557</guid>
		<description>Our research into eBay&#039;s transaction data over two years shows that Apple probably should have made a pink iPod shuffle.  Girls tend to prefer these over more expensive, larger, and more feature-rich MP3 players:

    http://tr.im/hl4w</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our research into eBay&#8217;s transaction data over two years shows that Apple probably should have made a pink iPod shuffle.  Girls tend to prefer these over more expensive, larger, and more feature-rich MP3 players:</p>
<p>    <a href="http://tr.im/hl4w" rel="nofollow">http://tr.im/hl4w</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.miss604.com/2009/03/the-new-ipod-shuffle-minimalism-at-a-whole-new-level.html#comment-11556</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miss604.com/?p=9129#comment-11556</guid>
		<description>I have the oldest fashion of the Ipod Shuffle and to me it is small enough! Is the Ipod company going to keep getting smaller and smaller with their products until we can barely see the gosh darn thing? I will stick to my Ipod Shuffle I have now, I just do not see any point of upgrading and upgrading...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the oldest fashion of the Ipod Shuffle and to me it is small enough! Is the Ipod company going to keep getting smaller and smaller with their products until we can barely see the gosh darn thing? I will stick to my Ipod Shuffle I have now, I just do not see any point of upgrading and upgrading&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.miss604.com/2009/03/the-new-ipod-shuffle-minimalism-at-a-whole-new-level.html#comment-11555</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miss604.com/?p=9129#comment-11555</guid>
		<description>Apple have been walking a trecherous tight-rope for some years now. The balancing act between providing functional simplicity and insulting people&#039;s intelligence is fought over and again with the release of each new Apple product.

The new Shuffle, sadly falls into the latter category. It tries to solve a problem that never really existed and in doing so creates an even bigger one. &lt;em&gt;There was nothing wrong with having the controls on the device itself because you could clip it anywhere!&lt;/em&gt; By taking the controls away Apple have forced people use their own-brand earbuds, even though they suck.

How have they solved the non-problem of having no screen? They&#039;ve introduced voice-over which sounds like the product of a career outreach program for Stephen Hawking and HAL 9000&#039;s retarded children. I mean come on! At least that is optional.

On an asthetic note, they&#039;ve not only made the thing look boring by taking away the controls which were quite a nice design feature, they&#039;ve taken away the colour options! Silver and black, jeez, don&#039;t break your imagination bones, guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple have been walking a trecherous tight-rope for some years now. The balancing act between providing functional simplicity and insulting people&#8217;s intelligence is fought over and again with the release of each new Apple product.</p>
<p>The new Shuffle, sadly falls into the latter category. It tries to solve a problem that never really existed and in doing so creates an even bigger one. <em>There was nothing wrong with having the controls on the device itself because you could clip it anywhere!</em> By taking the controls away Apple have forced people use their own-brand earbuds, even though they suck.</p>
<p>How have they solved the non-problem of having no screen? They&#8217;ve introduced voice-over which sounds like the product of a career outreach program for Stephen Hawking and HAL 9000&#8242;s retarded children. I mean come on! At least that is optional.</p>
<p>On an asthetic note, they&#8217;ve not only made the thing look boring by taking away the controls which were quite a nice design feature, they&#8217;ve taken away the colour options! Silver and black, jeez, don&#8217;t break your imagination bones, guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Jennings</title>
		<link>http://www.miss604.com/2009/03/the-new-ipod-shuffle-minimalism-at-a-whole-new-level.html#comment-11554</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Jennings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miss604.com/?p=9129#comment-11554</guid>
		<description>We had a couple of tweet-storms on Twitter today about the new shuffle.

To my mind, the market for a display-less MP3 player is, at best, pretty limited.  Unless you must have Apple, there are similarly tiny players out there that will give you a tiny display - and so raise the level of functionality significantly.

I&#039;ve been very happy indeed with my 3rd generation nano (&quot;the fatty&quot;) and can&#039;t see that the reduction in size from that to a shuffle would bring anybody any positives whilst obviously bringing with it a lot of negatives.

And you&#039;re right about the headphones. Not only do they not fit a lot of ears, they&#039;re never going to last forever... and when they break your replacement options are severely limited. No longer are you able to pop into the nearest electronics store and grab whatever-fits-your-budget (and ears) off the shelf.

Have you heard the voice? Apparently OSX Leopard has some voice support built-in which the shuffle manages to take advantage of. It isn&#039;t a great voice, but it&#039;ll get the point across. But if you&#039;re running Windows or OSX Tiger... as @runforcover said it &quot;sounds like something from The Onion&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had a couple of tweet-storms on Twitter today about the new shuffle.</p>
<p>To my mind, the market for a display-less MP3 player is, at best, pretty limited.  Unless you must have Apple, there are similarly tiny players out there that will give you a tiny display &#8211; and so raise the level of functionality significantly.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been very happy indeed with my 3rd generation nano (&#8220;the fatty&#8221;) and can&#8217;t see that the reduction in size from that to a shuffle would bring anybody any positives whilst obviously bringing with it a lot of negatives.</p>
<p>And you&#8217;re right about the headphones. Not only do they not fit a lot of ears, they&#8217;re never going to last forever&#8230; and when they break your replacement options are severely limited. No longer are you able to pop into the nearest electronics store and grab whatever-fits-your-budget (and ears) off the shelf.</p>
<p>Have you heard the voice? Apparently OSX Leopard has some voice support built-in which the shuffle manages to take advantage of. It isn&#8217;t a great voice, but it&#8217;ll get the point across. But if you&#8217;re running Windows or OSX Tiger&#8230; as @runforcover said it &#8220;sounds like something from The Onion&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.miss604.com/2009/03/the-new-ipod-shuffle-minimalism-at-a-whole-new-level.html#comment-11553</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miss604.com/?p=9129#comment-11553</guid>
		<description>Yes, I definitely need to upgrade my static, no display mp3 player every year so that everyone can see how stylish I am! Just kidding!

I actually question the motivation of Apple to update their shuffle so drastically each year as it serves no direct purpose...but then anyone who understands the logic behind &quot;The Story of Stuff&quot; knows that it&#039;s just a way to set apart the &#039;haves&#039; and the &#039;have nots&#039;...I wouldn&#039;t dare go running with last years iPod - YUCK! :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I definitely need to upgrade my static, no display mp3 player every year so that everyone can see how stylish I am! Just kidding!</p>
<p>I actually question the motivation of Apple to update their shuffle so drastically each year as it serves no direct purpose&#8230;but then anyone who understands the logic behind &#8220;The Story of Stuff&#8221; knows that it&#8217;s just a way to set apart the &#8216;haves&#8217; and the &#8216;have nots&#8217;&#8230;I wouldn&#8217;t dare go running with last years iPod &#8211; YUCK! <img src='http://www.miss604.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss604</title>
		<link>http://www.miss604.com/2009/03/the-new-ipod-shuffle-minimalism-at-a-whole-new-level.html#comment-11552</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss604</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 04:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miss604.com/?p=9129#comment-11552</guid>
		<description>I hear ya about the size factor - the only reason I don&#039;t lose my USB thumbdrive is because it&#039;s attached to my keychain.

The voice technology is actually pretty neat (the way it adds playlists too) but really, I&#039;ve heard so many complaints about the headphones that it&#039;s silly they&#039;d make a device that will only work withe their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear ya about the size factor &#8211; the only reason I don&#8217;t lose my USB thumbdrive is because it&#8217;s attached to my keychain.</p>
<p>The voice technology is actually pretty neat (the way it adds playlists too) but really, I&#8217;ve heard so many complaints about the headphones that it&#8217;s silly they&#8217;d make a device that will only work withe their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimm</title>
		<link>http://www.miss604.com/2009/03/the-new-ipod-shuffle-minimalism-at-a-whole-new-level.html#comment-11551</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 01:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miss604.com/?p=9129#comment-11551</guid>
		<description>It just looks to small to lose and or break. I have to agree with the headphones part, both of the voices are annoying as hell.  I&#039;ll stick with my 2nd gen nano (that I got when my boo was born) or save up and get an itouch.

Smaller isn&#039;t always better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just looks to small to lose and or break. I have to agree with the headphones part, both of the voices are annoying as hell.  I&#8217;ll stick with my 2nd gen nano (that I got when my boo was born) or save up and get an itouch.</p>
<p>Smaller isn&#8217;t always better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.miss604.com/2009/03/the-new-ipod-shuffle-minimalism-at-a-whole-new-level.html#comment-11550</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 01:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miss604.com/?p=9129#comment-11550</guid>
		<description>That is way too small. Sometimes I feel like I&#039;ll lose my 2nd gen shuffle. I also don&#039;t like how Apple is basically force feeding their crap earbuds down our throats this way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is way too small. Sometimes I feel like I&#8217;ll lose my 2nd gen shuffle. I also don&#8217;t like how Apple is basically force feeding their crap earbuds down our throats this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Finlayson</title>
		<link>http://www.miss604.com/2009/03/the-new-ipod-shuffle-minimalism-at-a-whole-new-level.html#comment-11549</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Finlayson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miss604.com/?p=9129#comment-11549</guid>
		<description>Maybe Apple should use Feist&#039;s appearance on Sesame Street for the new iPod commercial?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fciD_II7NI

Classic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Apple should use Feist&#8217;s appearance on Sesame Street for the new iPod commercial?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fciD_II7NI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fciD_II7NI</a></p>
<p>Classic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

